Enough? No, but necessary
While the statement is questionable from a standpoint of historical accuracy (thirty years ago, you can be damned sure that the IRA wanted to injure or kill whoever it had to, "combatant" or not, to make its point--this is the essence of terrorism), it says volumes about where the IRA is today. That is: engaging in a peace process, coming to terms with the interests of the other parties in that process, and trying to put the legacy of violence aside despite continued terror from groups like the "Real IRA." Or, more cynically, dealing with the reality of a massive anti-terrorism war fought by the US and the UK following September 11, and accordingly changing with the times.
But that possibility shouldn't overshadow the significance of this release. It doesn't come close to absolving the IRA of past actions, but it's a necessary move to build credibility as they head away from that legacy toward a more sustainable drive for peace.
Amazon follows Google, becomes a dev platform
This opens some interesting opportunities. If I become an Amazon associate and embed my associate ID in a tool like iTunes2Manila, is it ethical for me to keep associate revenue that is generated by people who use my script on their website? Probably not, but it's a fun thought... :)
Alas, I won't be at MEETUP
Quicktime 6 out
Hey, let's all violate the DMCA!
And yet, of course, discussing the problem is potentially a DMCA violation, because we’re discussing how to circumvent encryption technology. Never mind our intent: to help consumers. From 24-Hour Drive-Thru’s article:
When consumer publications like Consumer Reports test locks, the most important thing they do is try to break in. They send locksmiths to go to work on the locks, they get out the boltcutters on padlocks, and report which ones are broken into most easily and which ones do the best to stand up under attack. Nobody thinks there's anything sinister about that—everybody can see the practical value. And yet when you try to do the same thing for computer technology, you're a criminal.Indeed, this very Weblog entry may well be a felony under the DMCA. I'll let you know what day to watch out for me on “Cops.”
Accessibility: relative font sizes
Mark Pilgrim: Using relative font sizes. I should be pointing to one of Mark’s articles every day. This is just one of the thoughtful, well written articles on the state of designing web sites for accessibility in 2002. It offers a good mix of audience justification for taking the trouble to make your pages resizable (“if people can't read your words, what's the point?”) and technical details, including stylesheet tricks that prevent Netscape 4 and Mac Opera 5 from choking on CSS syntax they don’t understand.
Of course, I haven’t had time to implement his suggestions yet. Next on my list…
Straight back to 1989
Incidentally, it appears that Chris Heschong is World Leader Pretend, according to Google.
Last updated Tuesday, July 16, 2002 at 7:16:12 PM.
Here's the print-friendly version of this page.

-




